Individuals with higher rates of mind – or the inclination to maintain awareness and awareness at the moment – are more able to trade with the woes of their rejection by others, according to a recent study led by a team of Virginia Commonwealth University researchers.
The social rejection can have a number of negative consequences for both the rejected health and well-being of the individual, as well as his or her personal relationships, said Alexandra Martelli, a PhD candidate in the Department of Psychology at the Faculty of Humanities and Science. “For this it is necessary in a position that researchers find adaptive methods in response to social rejection, and awareness can be a schematic arrangement of effective emotion.”
School education, “when less is more: intelligence expects adaptive romantic response to rejection by minimizing the assignment of the mountain,” will announce in the journal Knowledge of Social and Neuroscience.
Researchers from Virginia Commonwealth University, the University of California, Los Angeles, and the University of Kentucky were inquisitive to see if the mind could be a barrier against distress and the pain of social rejection.
They conducted an experiment in which 40 university students reported their assigned brain rates and then placed them in the MRI scanner. The researchers observed vivid images of the participants’ head activity during their game of rounding the ball with what they thought were other partners.
In the last third of the match, participants are denied receiving any balls from other players, trying to determine the rules and rules of social rejection.
After the survey session, participants were interviewed about the extent of their grief during the game. Participants who have higher rates of mind said less distress than being excluded.
The association between the mind and the declining social weakness was also observed in the head imaging. The researchers found that there was less activity in the left ventricular lobes, which are known to help with the “top down” regulation of the eye and social forms of pain.
The researchers also analyzed communication between the ventral frontal cortex and other head regions during social rejection. The researchers found that the most cognitively exposed people showed a less functional connection between the ventral frontal lobe cortex and two parts of the head that co-generated the experience of social distress, the amygdala, and dorsal frontal cortex.
“Our findings suggest that individuals with taste do not suffer from distress or distress as a result of social rejection,” the researchers wrote. “Neuroscience suggests that the proponents of the adaptive behavior of rational people to reject are that they are not overly recruited (and thus charged)” from top to bottom “by the inhibitory head to discourage social distress, instead, . “Emotional order layouts from bottom to top that prevent rejection from causing distress in the first place.” Interventions that try to help people who are socially separated and who are denied such data may be helpful and biologically familiar. ”
Martelli is a researcher at the Virginia Commonwealth University’s Social Psychology and Neuroscience Laboratory. The lab, led by David Chester, PhD, an associate professor of psychology and a contributing author of school education, tries to understand why people seek to hurt each other in the wake of experiences such as rejection.
Chester said “vigilance has beneficial effects for many mental and behavioral diseases.”
“However, our understanding of how the mind achieves these beneficial results is not fully understood by many aspects.” Our findings collaborated in shedding light on the main biological and psychological methods and methods of work through which the mind helps individuals to deal with painful social experiences, Such as rejection and exclusion. ”
In particular, school education suggests that rational people are not discouraged by social rejection and that intelligent people succeed in arranging such painful feelings by not using discouraging and strenuous processes that inhibit their feelings of social distress.
“This is important because the use of such a” top-to-bottom “romantic organization has been counterproductive and associated with the unfortunate consequences of emotion, such as impulse,” he said. “Rational individuals are more likely to use a more” bottom-up “approach, which makes sense because of the tendency of these people to focus on the organic assets of their emotions. Rejection of exercise on the techniques of the mind.
The findings of school education are relevant to social psychology, and Martelli spoke an important knowledge of the nerves of the father, because they further grasped the central nervous system
The results of school education are linked to the work of the Social Psychology and Neuroscience Laboratory, Martelli said, because they add to the understanding of the main methods and methods of action of aggression and violence within interpersonal relationships.
“The heavy reliance on top-down emotional order layouts can lead to a self-regulatory failure,” Martelli said. “Therefore, bottom-up, such as mind, can be effective in arranging difficult emotions such as anger or frustration, which is usually caused by violent or aggressive acts.”
Studies suggest that violent behavior is often caused by the interaction of circumstantial and individual causes, which means that people learn violent behavior through their families, people in society, and cultural influences. Some aggressors have been abused during their childhood. Children who are victims Violence is seen as an appropriate way to resolve differences and problems between people. Children who learn that women are not worthy of reverence and see hardness for women are more likely to offend women when they grow up. Girls who live in a family The hardness of more susceptible to exposure to violence by their husbands, as well as alcohol and substance abuse can also participate in the stubborn disposition
Hardness is considered one of the ways to deprive a person of his entitlements granted by legislation and the constitution. This is a societal condition, which is not a new birth, but it has emerged since the appearance of human life on the surface of the planet. Community hardness family. Family cruelty includes the concept of family cruelty to all types of abuse and abuse among members of the same family, and by different methods adopted by the dominant individual in the family, and can open other names such as family abuse, marital abuse, and spark the start of family cruelty usually minor marital differences to develop later To severe, and cases of family cruelty vary between minor and serious, and the situation can lead to family violence to subject the injured party to physical and psychological treatment